Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

The Truth About Leads
Amazon.com

 

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 and 2010 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

Featured in Alltop

B2B Marketing

BlogNotions

SOLD Magazine

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Lead Generation 2.0: Part 1, A Lead By Any Other Name …

  
  
  

RoseWhen Gertrude Stein penned, "A rose is a rose is a rose," she was commenting on how essence is expressed in naming and how that naming calls up associated meanings.

Let's see how it works for B2B lead generation: a sales lead is a sales lead is a sales lead.

Surely all of us in sales and marketing are on the same page when it comes to the meaning of a "sales lead." If it were only so.

On good days, marketing forwards a lead to sales, and the sales representative finds a well-qualified prospect who meets established criteria and warrants immediate attention.

But, oh, those days of disconnects. Marketing's cover email to sales notes one of its initiatives has delivered a qualified lead. Yet when the sales representative contacts the prospect, he finds qualifying criteria overstated or reported by someone who can't actually make a decision and drive a budget.

Too often, marketing's take on a sales lead reads like this:

A sales lead is a contact is an inquiry is an interested self-educator.

And sales reps waste time on those "leads" when what they need reads like this:

A sales lead is a qualified sales opportunity is a sales-qualified lead is a sales-ready buyer.

Missing is a consensus on what a sales lead is. More specifically, the two groups need to identify and agree on ideal criteria for highly qualified sales opportunities that warrant attention from sales representatives.

An internal or external prospect development resource will address each and every one of the following criteria when delivering qualified prospects to the field:

  1. Vertical (SIC or NAICS code)
  2. Firmographics (revenue, # of employees or # of locations)
  3. Decision makers/influencers and respective roles in the decision-making process
  4. Environment (related to each solution—such as "technical environment")
  5. Decision maker level of engagement (engaged or referral but in the loop)
  6. Business issues/pains uncovered and validated
  7. Decision making process documented
  8. Budget allocated or process for establishing a budget documented
  9. Competitive landscape documented
  10. Sense of urgency or compelling event

Note that while it's important to address each of these criteria in the qualifying and nurturing process, not every one may be fully realized at handoff. For example, recent research is showing that many prospect firms become fully engaged in reviewing solutions without a budget in place. Business case strength will drive funding, and the lead is qualified based on engagement with the correct, empowered decision maker and compelling need.

So whether we use qualified sales opportunity, sales-qualified lead or sales-ready buyer, the important thing is that sales and marketing share a clear and concise definition of the criteria that qualify opportunities ready for handoff.

In subsequent installments of this series, these criteria are used to challenge assumptions around the perceived advantages of lower costs-per-lead (Part 2) and higher volumes of leads (Part 3).

And by the way, I would be remiss if I didn't allow Shakespeare to also weigh in on naming and associated meanings:

What's in a name?

That which we call a sales-ready buyer by any other name would smell as sweet.

Click here for the series Introduction: Three Keys to the Kingdom of Sales Leads
This blog is Part 1: A Lead By Any Other Name ...
Click here for Part 2: Comparing Cost-Per-Lead Apples & Oranges
Click here for Part 3: The Sales Lead Paradox: Less Is More

 

 

 

 

Tell us what you think!

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics