Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

The Truth About Leads
Amazon.com

 

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 and 2010 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

Sales Pro Central

Featured in Alltop

B2B Marketing

BlogNotions

SOLD Magazine

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Lead Generation Best Practices Part 6: Fewer Leads Are Better

  
  
  

Best Practice #6There is a counter-intuitive relationship between lead volume and sales performance.

With sales organizations facing lower numbers, it seems logical to turn to volume lead generation to fill their pipelines with more and more sales leads in hopes that some will turn into sales. After all, shouldn't more leads deliver more opportunities?

In reality, just the opposite often turns out to be true. Standard lead generation’s focus on quantity—rather than quality—results in the following:

  • The pipeline is flooded with a high volume of low-value leads.
  • Qualifying criteria are rarely met due to lack of marketing resources.
  • Sales reps’ calendars are cluttered with unqualified meetings.
  • Money is wasted on sales lead generation programs that don’t work.

Sales reps actually need fewer sales leads—or more accurately, fewer raw, unfiltered, unqualified marketing leads. Conversely, they need carefully qualified leads that have been correctly developed until they are ready to be delivered as high-value qualified sales opportunities.

By focusing sales resources on a smaller number of better quality leads, they can spend time more effectively on the most likely buyers. Such a practice makes sense in any economic climate, but in our current market downturn it can be a way to actually improve efficiency and do more with fewer resources. This also renews the value of lead generation programs, since reps start receiving leads they can actually use.

Best-of-class prospect development—and its focus on fewer, higher qualified sales leads—fills forecasts with sales-ready buyers and helps marketing and sales resources operate more efficiently. In the end, it means great return on program investments and higher company revenue.

For an in-depth look at the concept that sales benefits from receiving fewer, more highly-qualified leads, I encourage you to download the PointClear white paper, Why Your Sales Force Needs Fewer Marketing Leads.

The next installment in the series looks at measuring results with an emphasis on moving beyond the lowest cost-per-lead as the most important indicator.

Read Introducing the 7-Part Series
Read Part 1: Agree on Lead Definition
Read Part 2: Segment & Test Your Market
Read Part 3: When to Use Outbound vs Inbound
Read Part 4: Dedicate Qualifying Resources
Read Part 5: Multiply Touches/Media/Cycles

This blog is Part 6: Fewer Leads Are Better
Read Part 7: Measure Beyond Cost-Per-Lead
Read Summarizing the 7-Part Series

Tell us what you think!

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics