Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

The Truth About Leads
Amazon.com

 

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 and 2010 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

Sales Pro Central

Featured in Alltop

B2B Marketing

BlogNotions

SOLD Magazine

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

B2B Marketers, Analyze This: How Do Prospects Score YOU on Their Experience?

  
  
  

Bob ThompsonToday's guest blogger, Bob Thompson, is CEO of CustomerThink Corp., an independent research and publishing firm focused on customer-centric business management, and Founder/Editor-in-Chief of CustomerThink.com, the world's largest community dedicated to customer-centric business.

Imagine going into bank to open up a checking account with a few dollars you've managed to scrape together. But based on your grungy attire it doesn't seem likely (to the banker) that you'll be a valuable customer. You're made to wait an hour, treated rudely, and then told your opening deposit isn't big enough to get an account.

What do you do when you leave that bank? You'll probably tell your friends, post on Facebook or Twitter and in general try to get even like Dave Carroll in United Breaks Guitars.

OK, this a consumer example. How does it relate to B2B marketing? Well, let me share another example—and this one is not hypothetical.

Last year I was looking for forms software to support CustomerThink. As I reported in my "Customer 2.0" buying experience post, I searched for solutions, interacted with various web sites and engaged with some of the vendor reps, by email or phone.

I eventually found the right solution, but that's not where the story ends. To most of the vendors that I engaged with, I was just another not-very-valuable small business buyer. And I was treated accordingly, no doubt thanks to some nifty lead scoring algorithms that have become de rigueur for B2B marketers.

Not faulting them for that, but they probably didn't factor into their scoring that I also post on CustomerThink, an online community with 80K+ visitors per month. Or that I have friends in the publishing business that are also potential buyers. And what do you know, just recently an industry colleague asked me for advice on similar tools, and I was only too happy to share my buying experience privately.

Bottom line: While I may not have been scored as a valuable prospect, I was valuable in other ways—as an influencer.

Lead Scoring is Seller-Centric

Two years ago, my B2B Marketing 2.0 article cited a statistic from CSO Insights that 60% of marketing organizations used some form of lead scoring before passing leads to sales. I'm sure that percentage has gone up considerably since then. The point of lead scoring is to assess the value of the prospect to you—the seller—so you can make the best use of your resources.

The problem with this "left-brained" approach is that it doesn't consider the prospect experience. Poorly implemented, a heavily automated buying process can leave potential buyers cold, and non-buyers feeling like they are "not worthy." Who wants to be treated like a number, or valued only based on the size of the immediate purchase?

This is classic inside-out thinking, the same thing that got CRM into trouble. While being pitched as building loyal relationships, CRM has been much more commonly implemented as a technique to extract value from customers (and prospects) as efficiently as possible. Pretty unbalanced, if you put yourselves in customers' shoes.

Scoring the Prospect Experience

What I'm advocating is that you take a time out from scoring your prospects on their ability to satisfy your immediate business needs. Instead, spend time to really understand how your prospects—all of them—perceive their experience with your brand. From the initial web search to interacting with your web site to engaging with inside or field sales reps, all of these touchpoints form an impression and influence their likelihood to recommend.

Think about it, with the classic "funnel" thinking, only a small fraction of those entering the top of the funnel are likely to become customers. But ALL prospects will form an impression! Why not take the opportunity to turn everyone into an advocate for your business, even if they are not the right fit at this point in time?

Look for opportunities to get prospect feedback. There are a variety of web analytics and web feedback solutions that can give you insight on how well the buying process is working for buyers. You could even hire "mystery prospects" to take on different personas (some valuable, some not), and share the results of how they felt after interactions.

Speaking of personas, it's a powerful technique to get inside the mind of prospects. Tony Zambito, Founder of Goal Centric and an expert in buyer personas, agrees that "in the social age it is even more important to consider the buying experiences of all the potential persona types." Such as:

  • User Persona: The actual user of the product or service.
  • Buyer Persona: The actual buyer of the product or service (not necessarily the user).
  • Influencer Persona: Sometimes referred to as a stakeholder persona, more commonly in a B2B setting.
  • Website Persona: Someone (other than buyer or user) given the task of researching products and services.
  • Social Consumer or Business Persona: Active social participants.

Building a great B2B brand

There are now a stunning number of companies involved in B2B marketing automation—from vendors to consultants to analysts—all essentially promoting the idea that you can optimize your way to success. But time and time again, studies find that industry leaders and the truly great brands balance inside-out ("what's in it for me?") with outside-in ("how can I serve you better").

According to Kevin Randall, writing in It's a Fact: Strong Brands Drive B2B Markets, brands matter (in part) because they "tap into emotional drivers."

"Brands matter because companies act just like people when it comes to evaluating what products or services to buy. Along with a number of explicit rational criteria, a powerful irrational impulse is always present to influence the purchase decision. A strong brand with an effective positioning strategy speaks to and taps into the totality of these buyer needs."

So the next time you're discussing how to score prospects, think also about how they are scoring you. Delivering a great prospect experience can help you differentiate and become one of those B2B brands that businesspeople talk about like consumers rave about Zappos!

Additional Resources:

Tell us what you think!

Comments

Bob: Excellent ideas. The first battle has been to get marketers to ask questions and then score. The issue is that salespeople take scoring to mean more than it is. Scoring is an indicator of interest. Period. One common trait is that inquirers all lie about their needs, which throws the scoring matrix out of kilter. The score should be a guide but not the end. Just because someone doesn’t score well doesn’t mean they aren’t buyers. Only salespeople can decide that. I have found that 76% of the inquirers say they will buy (24% are students, prisoners and competitors). Of the 76%, 45% will eventually buy. The best policy because of these facts is a 100% follow-up policy which addresses the hidden buyers and those who have influence and recommend.
Posted @ Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:45 PM by James Obermayer
Hi Bob, 
 
Thank you for the mention in this excellent post. Understanding the relationship between experience and prospect it the key to delivering on the ultimate buying experience. And factoring in that there may multiple buyer and user personas changes the game for many organizations. To better serve buyers, B2B companies will need to gain this deep understanding. Buyer persona development is a means to do just that! 
 
Thanks, 
Tony Zambito
Posted @ Wednesday, March 23, 2011 6:22 AM by Tony Zambito
Thanks to all for the feedback and kind words.  
 
Automating marketing and other customer-related processes is necessary to running an efficient business. But it's not the end game, in my view. After all, when everyone has implemented automation technology, what advantage do you gain?  
 
Granted, there is a window of opportunity for B2B marketers to gain a (temporary) advantage by being first to automate or doing it more effectively. I think that’s the state of B2B marketing right now, and it’s creating a gold rush towards technology.  
 
But strategically, most B2B brands are not built on internal efficiency but rather perceived value. Experiences matter as much as the product/service being purchased, and WOM is extremely important. The buyer and non-buyer experience both contribute to that value, although it’s not as easy to keep score on how these perceptions translate into long-term profitable growth.  
 
B2B Marketers shouldn’t confuse ease of analytics with importance. Einstein said it best: "Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."  
Posted @ Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:43 PM by Bob Thompson
I thought it was interesting that the notion of lead score is being looked at separately from buyer/user persona development. 
I guess that's more of a commentary on how marketers tend to view lead score - as some sort of formula that quantifies potential for lead ratings and ultimately monetization. In essence, "where's the low hanging fruit"? Because all of our time is so valuable that we can’t be bothered with lead follow up unless it's truly warranted... right? Wrong. Lead Scoring is (should be) a derivative from good buyer persona development. This means after looking at WHY and HOW past customers purchased or interacted with your business you will likely see similar trends emerge – even similar buyer traits (personal wants and needs are the MOST important aspect of this). What does your buyer need in order to FEEL fulfilled when purchasing, why do they LIKE you and your widgets better than the next guy. After we get to the root of WHY and HOW buyers behave the way they do – then we can develop score models and hopefully apply them correctly. 
So what’s the problem? Well, most marketers can’t tell you why their buyer buys or what the product actually gives the buyer, which fulfills him/her. Sad but true – and of organizations of all size, some enterprise level orgs are even worse than SMB’s because they have so many moving parts that the disconnect between the sale and the department driving leads toward the sale becomes a true chasm. 
So what’s the fix? Recognize that before you can establish Lead Score or develop Buyer Personas or purchase Marketing Automation – you probably need to take your marketing team back to square one. One of the most successful ways to do so, we’ve found, is have a third party learn your business and why they should buy from you. This allows the entire marketing team to look at their product and their buyer through untrained eyes, free from their long accepted assumptions and well-developed reports and analysis. I guarantee there will be a lot of light bulb moments during this exercise. It’s the poor man’s focus group – and it works. 
Anyway, not to hijack the article, which I think is good, however it is somewhat reflective of what most marketers want to do – start on third base. One and two aren’t as sexy, but no one ever scored a run without touching them.
Posted @ Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:54 PM by Justin Gray
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics