Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

The Truth About Leads
Amazon.com

 

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 and 2010 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

Sales Pro Central

Featured in Alltop

B2B Marketing

BlogNotions

SOLD Magazine

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Five Reasons Your Lead Generation Campaigns May Not Be Working

  
  
  

Craig_RosenbergToday's guest blogger, Craig Rosenberg, is Vice President, Focus Expert Network at Focus, a company whose mission is to make business expertise available to everyone. Craig works with business and industry experts to cultivate the Focus.com network.

For the past 11 years, I have been advising organizations on how to plan and execute their b2b lead generation campaigns. B2B lead generation is complex, and there is always work to be done. There are some big reasons why lead generation campaigns fail that must be dealt with at the outset, before sweating the small stuff.

Here are my 5 reasons your lead generation campaigns may not be working:

  1. No start-to-finish process: The best lead/demand generation programs are "always-on," systematic processes. The process map has been drawn from the top of the funnel to close with associated metrics, processes, people, and technology to support it. As a matter of fact, successful lead generation processes rarely run what we know as "campaigns." Instead they are like supply chains, with the "factory" always humming (except on holidays), churning out qualified leads for their hungry consumers: sales.
  2. No unified lead definition: I'm borrowing the term "unified lead definition" from Brian Carroll (http://twitter.com/#!/brianjcarroll). "Unified lead" is defined as the agreement made between marketing and sales as to what will get passed to sales. Without this, you can rarely—if ever—be successful in lead generation. The unified lead definition should be demographic (company size, contact role/function) and psychographic (has a need, pain, etc.) and signed like a contract by both sides. The unified lead definition sets expectations with sales, and it helps marketing by creating processes focused on giving sales what it wants. For example, for simplistic reasons, let's say the unified lead definition is 100-plus manufacturing companies, director-of-IT-level (or higher) contact who is ready to hear more. Now that is something marketing can work with: They can create content focused on that target, filter the database to only market to that contact, set up scoring, and more.
  3. No phone-based qualification team: One symptom I see in failing lead generation programs is simple to diagnose: When "leads" go from the Internet, tradeshows, etc., directly to sales, the programs will fail. The phone can and will make all the difference in the world. Most great lead generation programs have a tele-function that acts to qualify and subsequently introduce leads that meet your unified lead definition to sales. It works now and has for years.
  4. No optimization: Lead generation is an ever-evolving process. If a program starts slowly, make sure there are several attempts to make changes before you give up. All great lead generation programs take work. Frankly, any lead generation program that is wildly successful out of the gate rarely keeps up its torrid pace. (The law of numbers doesn't allow for that.) I have talked to plenty of organizations that say, "We have tried everything." My response is always, "Define 'tried'."
  5. It actually does work, you just don't know any better: There have been a number of cases where a sales or marketing leader has said, "Check out our lead generation programs and let me know what we need to do to fix this thing."

I look at both processes and numbers, and the program looks pretty good! In this case, what we have are completely unrealistic expectations. Instead, you really need benchmarks, so that everyone can feel comfortable with the reality of b2b marketing metrics. Let's agree that a good lead-to-opportunity conversion rate is 10 percent (yes, some are higher, and some are lower—but play along with me). Then out of 100 leads, 90 were deemed as unsuitable for now, and 10 were determined as fitting into the pipeline. That means we chose to work on 10; out of that, there may be one or two deals. Those numbers are very difficult for a lot of people to stomach.

That's my take—I hope it helps!

Tell us what you think!

Comments

Great list and let me add one more - investing in good data.  
We work with our clients to clearly define their Ideal Customer Profile to the nth degree. You have to have a laser focus on your buyer. Once you have done that you need to INVEST on a continuous basis is good data that targets those buyers. This is not an area to skimp on! This is an area that will give you an immense ROI. 
Great list - thanks!
Posted @ Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:05 PM by trish bertuzzi
Good list, thanks. Any suggestions to resolve a growing pain area for marketers in recent times, namely, prospects simply don't answer the inside salesperson's telephone call.
Posted @ Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:23 AM by Ketharaman Swaminathan
Nice, concise thoughts that will work 100% of the time. Some of my thoughts.  
 
1. Always on Lead Generation is a message to top management. If they want to sell consistently lead generation has to be consistent.  
 
2. Raw inquiries need tele-qualification (not qualified in any way). But Qualified leads should go to salespeople immediately. No need to slow down the process by having an in-between group asking the obvious if the answers are there for budget, authority , need, time., etc. Gee, that’s BANT! 
 
Posted @ Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:29 AM by James Obermayer
Some excellent points.  
 
Particularly agree with point 5. Many companies have no way of measuring not just their lead generation efforts but have no way of actually tracking the leads to closure.  
 
It is surprising how many focus all efforts on the top of the funnel without any way of managing the lead process.  
 
Posted @ Monday, June 20, 2011 5:37 AM by Duncan Macdonald
The five reasons you have just enumerated could not be truer.  
 
B2B lead generation is science and art on its own. Therefore, any company should follow a systematic process with quality assurance and quality control to prevent errors. Furthermore, it requires application of skills of the right people. 
 
Companies could not expect to obtain a steady stream of qualified sales leads and business appointments if they fail to follow the process or lack the expertise, or both.
Posted @ Monday, June 27, 2011 2:31 AM by SteveH
Great list. My favorite is the “Always On” attitude. After all, salespeople have to be “Always On” to make quota.  
 
Other reasons why lead generation fails: 
 
1. In direct marketing (telemarketing, mail or email) if the response is less than expected, first change the offer and 2nd check the list. Substantial sales lead leakage.  
 
2. You may not have a failed program you may have failed to count everything. Are you sure you are counting all of the inquiries? Most companies have sales lead leakage holes (calls to customer service or management that are never recorded, trade show leads that end up in a salesperson’s pocket, emails sent to a salesperson and never recorded). The sales lead leakage can be as high as 50%, but seems to average 30%. That means if a company is getting 1,000 leads a month they may actually be getting as much as 1,300. Large Sales Lead Leakage. 
 
3. Failure to qualify. Many lead generation programs could ask qualifying questions but fail to do so. You can prequalify 60% of all inquiries and convert them to leads by asking BANT like questions. Only telemarket the unqualified. Send the rest immediately to salespeople, Faster the better. Moderate Sales Lead Leak. 
 
4. Failure to have a landing page for the promotion. Yes, companies still send respondents to the website with just an extension to the url address. Smart respondents drop the extension and the name is lost in the great unwashed masses of others who have visited your site. Big Sales Lead Leak. 
 
5. Lead forwarding and response to the inquirer is slow. The inquirers from the web should get the requested material within seconds. The lead should be forwarded to a sales rep in seconds. Large Sales Lead Leak. 
 
6. Lack of follow-up by sales reps is the number one failure for lead generation campaigns. You fail to sell 100% of the sales leads you don’t follow-up on. If salespeople can’t do it, get a marketing automation program. Gigantic leak. 
 
 
 
What is a non-working lead generation campaign? I think low response is trumped by low conversion. If the conversion is high low response may be acceptable. Measuring conversion (ROI) is the one of the biggest sales lead leakage issues.  
 
 
 
Kinda of goes back to an old saying. “When you don’t want to do something, one excuse is as good as another.” Marketing that doesn’t measure conversion is just making an excuse. 
 
Posted @ Monday, June 27, 2011 2:15 PM by James Obermayer
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics