Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

The Truth About Leads
Amazon.com

 

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 and 2010 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

Featured in Alltop

B2B Marketing

BlogNotions

SOLD Magazine

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Truth #7—Attributes of a Well-Qualified Lead

  
  
  

There is a lot of talk about "BANT" in the marketplace today. "BANT" stands for budget, authority, need and timeframe; and there are some managers specifying that each element of "BANT" must be satisfied in order for a sales opportunity to be truly qualified. I don't actually believe in this practice, and I'm hopeful that you will agree with me.

For many if not most "enterprise deals" (or "the complex sale") it is not at all unusual for budget to be worked out during the sales process and via the use of a business case. If you prequalify for budget in those cases—you will find no leads. Similarly, the lack of a specific timeframe should not necessarily disqualify a prospect. If you find a decision-maker (real authority) with addressable pain, timeframe can be accelerated with analysis and a compelling business case.

That being said, there are ideal criteria for highly qualified sales opportunities and a high-end partner will address each and every one of these criteria when delivering qualified prospects to the field:

1. Vertical (SIC or NAICS code)
2. Firmographics (revenue, # of employees, # of locations...)
3. Decision makers/influencers and respective roles in the decision-making process
4. Environment (related to each solution—such as "technical environment")
5. Decision maker level of engagement (engaged, referral but in the loop...)
6. Business issues/pains uncovered and validated
7. Decision making process and documented
8. Budget allocated or process for establishing a budget documented
9. Competitive landscape documented
10. Sense of urgency or compelling event

Unfiltered, low-level leads generally have two or three of the data points in the list above, but rarely more than that and frequently the data points are overstated, misrepresentative of the real situation or are reported by someone who can't actually make a decision and establish a budget.

With a detailed picture of a prospect's business drivers, plans and buying process, the sales executive can be positioned as a knowledgeable business advisor rather than having to essentially requalify so-called leads on the front-end.

We'd love to hear your thoughts...

If you are a C-level or SVP-level executive, how much more effective might your sales executives be if they were provided with high quality sales opportunities rather than low-level leads?

If you are in sales, what percent of the leads you currently receive contain information about all ten criteria listed above? How about seven out of ten?

If you are in marketing, would it be helpful to prequalify leads, turn over those that are sales ready and nurture the rest? How well is that being done in your company today?

Tell us what you think!

Comments

Great post, Dan and a good exhaustive list of qualification criteria. 
 
Gotta love these guys who sell 5,000 "Leads" for free. Those aren't leads. They are a list of names. 
 
Jeff Ogden, the Fearless Competitor 
Find New Customers Lead Generation Made Simple 
<a>www.findnewcustomers.com
Posted @ Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:09 AM by Jeff Ogden
Dan,  
 
I follow what your saying and agree that qualification is not so cut and dry. I'd take about half of your criteria and say if contacts meet those items that will get them on my 'lead' list and they start meeting more I'd qualify them as a prospect (which I call a qualified lead). How much wiggle room on criteria is a function of the industry and the speed of the sales cycle in that industry. 
 
Victor Scipioni 
Business Development / Applications 
Micro Instrument Corp 
@AutomationBuff
Posted @ Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:48 PM by Victor Scipioni
Victor, 
 
 
 
Good thoughts! "Firmographic" data is table stakes for best-in-class organizations. Prior to investing valuable field sales resources, we feel it is essential to provide "pain, priority and process". These uncover addressable pain, level of decision-maker, compelling events and the process for a decision (which provides insight into the budgeting process and timeframe).  
 
Most sales reps are forced to settle for less than they should when it comes to sales leads. Working toward common lead definitions is a start to improving results. 
 
Thank you for your response! 
 
Best regards, 
 
Dan 
 
@dandade
Posted @ Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:52 AM by Dan McDade
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics