Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

Follow PointClear

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Lead Generation—What I have learned... the hard way.

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Post by guest blogger Karen Hayward, Executive Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer, CenterBeam.

Karen HaywardLead generation is a significantly more complicated and complex process given the technologies, automation and rising expectations of sales people.

This leads to the need for real best practice expertise—not only in one single aspect i.e. telesales or teleprospecting ... but in all of the aspects of the integrated lead generation process that must come into play to drive a successful outcome. So database management, process management, recruiting & staffing, training, program management, and data analysis and content are all key to the success of a program. To drive revenue in today's tough environment, it's more important than ever to find a partner that can offer you expertise in every one of these areas.

As an experienced buyer of these services, I offer the following considerations:

Beware ... make sure you get what you pay for and pay for what you get! Watch out for pay-for-lead approaches. It may seem like a good deal, but remember, the firm will be incented to provide a quantity of leads—quality will take the back seat. Recognize the value of a longer-term, nurturing approach. Ask your potential partner's clients what percent of closed deals in the last period were based on outsourced leads. Number of leads is not meaningful—closed deals are, and worth a premium.

Many service providers claim that they can call the CXO level ... be careful! Check them out ... they may call them but are they able to engage in a successful dialogue ... do they use a script or are they truly able to have a 20-30 minute business level conversation that results in an understanding of business priorities, a meaningful next step ... or in other words a qualified lead. CXOs engage in conversations when they perceive parity in business stature and quickly exit scripted conversations.

Don't forget to check out training infrastructure. Due to turnover, it is important to assess the training process for speed and completeness and the coaching capacity to ensure as a client you have uninterrupted coverage or at least minimize the effects of unexpected staff changes or performance management.

Follow the lead. A disciplined quality assurance process is probably among the most important attributes of a successful program. Evaluate the process to make sure that when a lead is sent from Marketing to Sales—it is treated with professionalism and a tremendous sense of urgency and appreciation.

Be prepared to be involved. Your success relies as much on your contribution to the program as it does on the partner. Expect to dedicate time weekly to drive continuous improvement and to tweak the focus as your prospecting needs change.

Why look outside for help? Using a partner has freed up our time to focus on the more strategic aspects of our marketing efforts and has placed the accountability for day-to-day program management in the hands of a team with the necessary specialized expertise, processes and technology to make it work. As a CMO, I always ask myself, what value I would really bring to managing this process in-house versus having on demand access to expertise, operational excellence and data analysis that comes as part of a partner's complete solution.

Comments

Karen - It's refreshing to see that your lead generation philosophy, as a CMO, is aligned with what I've found to work as a VP of Sales and growth-strategy consultant working with small and mid-sized companies. I know CMO's who don't view qualified lead generation as a key part of their job description and sales, especially new customer acquisition, suffer because of it. 
 
 
 
Based on poor choices I made early in my career (hiring a telemarketing company that outsourced off-shore) I definitely agree with all of your warnings.  
 
 
 
As far as in-house vs. out-sourced, if there is a best-of-breed solution and good alignment between the companies, outsourcing to a pro in any non-core business function almost always results in significant benefits. I've found that the biggest costs companies incur when they try to do too much in-house are the opportunity costs due to taking time, energy & money away from their core, strategic functions that they must execute in-house. 
 
 
 
Tony Rushin, Partner at Harvest Business Advisors
Posted @ Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:21 AM by Tony Rushin
Hi Karen, cant agree with you more where you say that pay per lead is a bad idea. Fortunately most companies have moved away from that policy and option, bu there still are a few companies that could snag some 'green' business that doesnt know any better
Posted @ Friday, September 04, 2009 8:05 AM by Tenders
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics