Dan McDade

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation is a blog exploring issues related to B2B sales, marketing and lead generation.

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

The Truth About Leads
Amazon.com

 

Authored by Dan McDade, president and CEO of PointClear, ViewPoint draws on his 20-plus years of experience helping companies develop prospects and drive revenues. Named one of the 50 most influential people in sales lead management in 2009 and 2010 by the Sales Lead Management Association, Dan offers insights into how to close the gap between marketing and sales and explorations on the most effective means of reaching target audiences—supported by real-world examples—Dan fosters productive thought and collaboration among executives.

Sales Pro Central

Featured in Alltop

B2B Marketing

BlogNotions

SOLD Magazine

case-in-point

PointClear immediately stood out from the pack due to strong references and the quality of its prospect development associates.

-Angela Bailey, Ingenix, a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group

ViewPoint | The Truth About Lead Generation

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Lead Management: Let’s Formalize this Relationship

  
  
  

Tony JarosToday's guest blogger, Tony Jaros, is Senior Vice President of Research at SiriusDecisions. As a sales and marketing thought leader with nearly 20 years experience, Tony has led the overall research function at SiriusDecisions since the company's founding in 2001.

Getting b-to-b sales and marketing to align more closely has driven even the most capable business leaders crazy for years. Team-building exercises, sensitivity training, workshops; what hasn’t been tried? While artificially developing mutual understanding and trust is certainly one method of trying to improve the relationship between the two functions, we believe a far better way is through shared process that leads to results.

The creation of service-level agreements (SLAs) within a broader lead management strategy is a perfect example of such process. When properly developed, they bind a number of functions to one another around a common goal: The creation and movement of better-qualified prospects through the demand waterfall.

At our recent SiriusDecisions Summit, nearly 400 audience members weighed in when asked the question: How complete are the demand creation SLAs your organization has forged between sales and marketing? The answers show that there are still a lot of cold feet out there; the most popular response was “We couldn’t spell SLA if you spotted us the ‘S’ and the ‘L’ (52 percent).” In fact, only 31 percent indicated sales and marketing have created and are governed by a “complete” SLA framework. So what do we at SiriusDecisions believe comprises a “complete” SLA schematic?

  • It encompasses the key points in the demand lifecycle where a lead will be handed from one function to another. In most b-to-b organizations, this includes the pass from marketing to teleprospecting, and teleprospecting to field, inside or channel sales resources.
  • It includes a “back-end” component. Set guidelines for the amount of time that will be allotted to either promote the lead to an opportunity with anticipated dollar value and timeframe to close, or to disqualify the lead and place it into a lead nurturing program. Create rules for pulling back leads that have not been promoted or disqualified back into teleprospecting (a process we refer to as “passive” recycling).
  • The SLAs are built on three pillars. Each SLA should be kept focused so that it isn’t too onerous, but it must have teeth. Include the definition(s) of leads that will be passed from one function to another. Pinpoint the responsibilities on each side of the equation; for example, how will marketing deliver its leads to teleprospecting? How long will teleprospecting have to accept or reject a lead? Finally, establish other relevant rules. Here, what will be the reasons why a receiving function can reject a lead without ever working it?

Systematic, repeatable b-to-b demand creation is much like a marriage. The creation of a series of SLAs acknowledges the relationship that must be forged between the two functions to drive this success, and puts defined boundaries around what each party must commit to in order to keep the relationship strong. Should either not be willing to commit, we’re pretty sure both will wind up in therapy—or worse—down the road.

Tell us what you think!

Comments

You nailed it Tony. I call them business rules but I like your SLA agreement better. I have had some managers after workshops where I talked about Business Rules for Lead Management say it was the ice breaker for codifying a rule set between the departments. Plus, the business rules or SLAs survive changes in management. Very few people will ignore the rules or service agreements. They live by them or adjust them but seldom ignore or delete them.
Posted @ Monday, August 01, 2011 7:58 PM by James Obermayer
Tony, this phenomenon has combined with the "faux newness" of digital marketing (hello, direct marketing!) led to an explosive outsourcing of lead generation -- that does not serve most marketers (or businesses) well. 
 
The reluctance to set up and fine-tune SLAs/business rules created a multi-billion dollar, multi-faceted online lead generation industry serving every imaginable sector: from senior care to home services (cable, phone, security, and insurance). And for most this has led to: 
 
- over-paying for under-qualified leads 
 
- increased pain when trying to address the issue -- through SLA/business rules 
 
Your marriage metaphor is wonderful :) and action steps appreciated. 
Posted @ Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:54 AM by Jeff Molander
Focusing on current demand waterfall benchmarks and then aspiring to meeting or beating best-in-class company benchmarks should be everyone's goal. In my mind, the key to this is to tighten up the quality of what goes in at the top of the process, what SiriusDecisions calls "marketing qualified leads". Thanks for your blog. I am anxious for others to weigh in. Jeff, I am assuming that your comments about outsourcing are directed at those companies that sell snake oil, not those of us that actually provide quality and value.
Posted @ Monday, August 08, 2011 9:49 AM by Dan McDade
Sorry, Dan. I'm not passing judgement on anyone; although my statement is a bit blanket, I'll admit. I'll also admit my perspective is rooted in experience on the B2C side (mortgages, education, insurance) where it's not snake oil that's sold; rather, it's poor leads. 
 
But in the end I suppose it's (lead) "buyer beware." And what's been going on (via outsourcing) isn't a crime or unethical. "Blind outsourcing" (of anything!) is a maturity issue on the *client* side; not an ethical one. So I appreciate your calling me out a bit on my statement :)
Posted @ Monday, August 08, 2011 12:12 PM by Jeff Molander
Thank you for sharing your great article and I like it very much. Welcome to Canada Goose Parka.
Posted @ Thursday, September 29, 2011 9:50 PM by Canada Goose Parka
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics